Filed Under:  Border Patrol, Cartels, Customs And Border Protection

Feds Drop $100 Million to Spot Flying, Homebrew Cocaine Mules

August 24th 2012   ·   3 Comments

A drug package can still be seen attached to the bottom of this downed cartel ultralight plane.
Photo: ChuckHolton/Flickr

Stopping drug smugglers on the ground is one thing. You can build a fence, send more Border Patrol agents and put up more cameras. But it’s a whole other thing to stop Mexico’s cartels from using tiny planes that are nearly impossible to catch.

That’s why the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is spending $100 million on new sensors that can detect ultralight aircraft. The giant contract — awarded to New York defense company SRCTec earlier this month — comes as the cartels have been using more of the planes to elude Border Patrol agents. The cartels also seem to have become pretty good at it. The Air Force has chased them with jets, and the Border Patrol has pursued them with Black Hawk helicopters.

Closer to gliders than complete planes; ultralight planes are small, cheap and their engines are relatively quiet. They move slowly, but are flown low to blend in with the southwest border’s rugged and hilly terrain, which the smugglers use to hide from radar. The last available data on ultralight incursions is from 2011, when the CBP detected 223 flights, double from two years prior. It stands to reason the real number is much higher, owing to the diminutive aircraft’s sneakiness.

According to government’s original solicitation for the ultralight detectors, the sensors are intended to counter “the high-priority threat presented by small, low-flying aircraft transiting across United States borders.” They should be able to work in hills and mountains, while simultaneously tracking two dozen ultralights from as low as 33 feet above ground level out to a range of 20 kilometers. They need to be built tough to withstand extreme weather conditions, and they should be easily transported across rough terrain.

SRCTec would not comment to Danger Room about the contract. But the company has developed a sensor, called VantagePoint, that appears to fit what the CBP is looking for. According to SRCTec’s product description, VantagePoint uses sensors and cameras to “detect and track people, vehicles, and low and slow aircraft, such as [unmanned aerial vehicles] and ultralights.” SRCTec claims the sensor works in rough terrain, packs into a box takes only a few hours to set up. It can also communicate with operators remotely.

Which all sounds good. One problem: there’s no telling how the Border Patrol plans to stop the planes once they detect them. The agency can’t legally shoot down ultralight planes just for carrying weed and blow. The ultralights don’t even have to land, either. Instead, the ultralights often fly low, and then drop their dope — in packages that can weigh up to 250 pounds — at a pre-planned location for an awaiting pick-up crew. Even if the government detects the aircraft, the pick-up crew on the ground is likely to be long gone by the time Border Patrol agents arrive. But if they can be tracked, then it gives agents a little more time to stop the shipment when it hits the ground.

The terrain may pose the biggest challenge, and has been a recurring problem for the Border Patrol, and not just with ultralight aircraft. The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the Border Patrol, spent $1 billion on a virtual fence of surveillance-radar towers — called SBInet — that ended up on the chopping block after the towers didn’t work. Terrain interference messed with their sensors, and maintenance issues caused the towers to break down.

The ultralight sensor plan was originally underneath SBInet, and has apparently survived its collapse. It’s now listed as a separate program apart from SBInet’s successor, the slimmed-down and more mobile Arizona Border Surveillance Technology Plan, which uses truck-mounted radars instead of fixed towers. At the same time, the Arizona plan has run into similar problems.

Like the Arizona plan, the ultralight sensors are supposed to be easily transportable. According to the solicitation, the sensors should be able to operate under battery power for up to four days at a time when not plugged into the U.S. electrical grid. Also, the agency wants the sensors to send data remotely to the CBP’s Air and Marine Operations Center in Riverside, California.

One reason the cartels use ultralight planes is because they’re really cheap. Prices can range from as low as $3,000 for an ultralight, and the planes can be manufactured at home. For a bigger ultralight, it can set you back $30,000. Drug prices are hard to estimate, but using figures from the U.S. Department of Health, a 250-pound load of marijuana could be worth more than $400,000. A similar weight in cocaine, could be worth more than $16 million wholesale.

That means absent cocaine, the cartels could make more money on marijuana flights in one year — just using ultralight aircraft — than the government will spend on its efforts to stop them. And the cartels can always buy more planes.

A version of this column originally appeared in www.wired.com.

Related Posts:

Tags:  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

By

Readers Comments (3)

  1. Michael says:

    It’s a WAR! Shoot them down for carrying drugs!

  2. We need a DMZ & no fly zone at our border w Mexico, and a govt willing to enforce US laws.





Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

What is 13 + 14 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

BEWARE

There may be graphic photographs that accompany some articles in the body of this report. It is not our intention to sensationalize. We include these photos in order to give to you, the American public, a clearer understanding of the seriousness of the situation we are in.

Polls

Why do you think the drug cartels are more violent in Mexico than the U.S.A.

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Loading

Facebook



Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The US Open Borders usopenborders.com, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The US Open Borders. The US Open Borders is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The US Open Borders is not supported by any political organization. The US Open Borders is a non-profit, non-partisan research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The US Open Borders is copyrighted. US Open Borders goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.