Filed Under:  Border Fence, Border Patrol, Customs And Border Protection, Texas

‘Securing America’s Borders’: Obama Admin. Closing 9 Border Patrol Stations Across 4 States

July 11th 2012   ·   25 Comments

Obama Administration Closing Nine Border Patrol Stations Across Four States

A US Border Patrol officer keeps watch over the border fence that divides the US from Mexico in the town of Nogales, Arizona (MARK RALSTON/AFP/Getty Images)

The Obama administration has announced plans to close nine Border Patrol stations across four states, including Texas, California, Montana and Idaho, CNN reports.

According to a statement from U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the closures are part of a broader plan to reallocate resources to high-priority areas in a bid to increase efficiency. The move will also relocate 41 Border Patrol officers closer to the northern and southern border.

“These deactivations are consistent with the strategic goal of securing America’s borders, and our objective of increasing and sustaining the certainty of arrest of those trying to enter our country illegally,” CBP spokesman Bill Brooks said in a statement. “By redeploying and reallocating resources at or near the border, CBP will maximize the effectiveness of its enforcement mandate and align our investments with our mission.”

The stations to be shut down in roughly six months are located in the following cities:

Abilene, Texas
San Angelo, Texas
Riverside, Calif.
Dallas, Texas
San Antonio, Texas
Lubbock, Texas
Amarillo, Texas
Twin Falls, Idaho
Billings, Montana

But the move is already causing panic among local law enforcement agencies, Border Patrol agents and members of Congress, reports:

Critics of the move warn the closures will undercut efforts to intercept drug and human traffickers in well-traveled corridors north of the U.S.-Mexico border. Though the affected stations are scattered throughout northern and central Texas, and three other states, the coverage areas still see plenty of illegal immigrant activity — one soon-to-be-shuttered station in Amarillo, Texas, is right in the middle of the I-40 corridor; another in Riverside, Calif., is outside Los Angeles.

But at least one Border Patrol supervisor in Texas has called on local officers to “voice your concerns” to elected officials, warning that the “deactivation” will remove agents from the Texas Panhandle, among other places. Several members of Congress have asked Border Patrol Chief Michael Fisher to reconsider the plan. And local officials are getting worried about what will happen once the Border Patrol leaves town, since they rely on those federal officials to assist in making immigration arrests.

“It could impact us tremendously since we’ve only got two agents up here now for 26 counties,” Potter County Sheriff Brian Thomas told

Potter County, in the Texas Panhandle, would be affected by the planned closure of the Amarillo station.

Thomas said that while his area is far from the border, it’s still a major “corridor” for illegal immigrants — and he said his office depends on Border Patrol to respond to their calls.

“I can’t hold a carload of people out there on I-40 for eight hours while somebody comes from El Paso,” he said. “I mean, that’s just crazy.”

Border Patrol’s resident agent in charge in Amarillo expressed similar worries, in a recent memo to local law enforcement alerting them to the planned closure. The official, Robert Green, warned that the “entire complement” of two agents would be reassigned from Amarillo to somewhere closer to the border. He said “there is no active plan” right now for Immigration and Customs Enforcement to fill the void on assisting local officials with stops.

Further, the Federation for American Immigration Reform said the interior stations set to be shut down serve as a “second line of defense” in apprehending illegal aliens and drug smugglers who make it across the border and into heavily traveled corridors in America.

“It’s part of the systematic dismantling of both border and interior enforcement,” FAIR Communications Director Bob Dane told “It complements the non-enforcement policy of this administration.”

CNN reports the government will be able to save $1.3 million a year by closing the nine stations.

It isn‘t certain whether the decision is related to the Obama administration’s continued claims that the U.S. border is more secure than it ever has been and apprehensions of illegal aliens are at their lowest levels since the 1970s.

Obama Administration Closing Nine Border Patrol Stations Across Four States

An old cattle fence, foreground, that used to mark the border, has been replaced by a border fence made to stop vehicle traffic along a remote section at the U.S.-Mexico border in San Miguel, Ariz. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)(AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

Some lawmakers are also already up in arms over the decision.

Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-Texas), who represents Amarillo, and two other state lawmakers who represent affected districts in a letter asked the Border Patrol chief to “reconsider the proposal,” Fox News reports.

Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-Texas) in a written statement said:

The Department of Homeland Security hasn’t demonstrated that sending additional resources to the border will be a more efficient use of resources than maintaining a presence further north… I‘d like to see numbers that reassure me that this strategy change won’t ultimately result in fewer arrests.

The move comes shortly after President Obama announced his new immigration policy that would halt the deportation of young illegal immigrations who came to the U.S. as children and who are not criminals. Then, the Supreme Court dealt another blow to advocates of stricter immigration enforcement and threw out parts of Arizona’s controversial immigration law.

(Related: SCOTUS Upholds Most Controversial Part of AZ Immigration Law)

And shortly after that, the Obama administration also announced a unilateral decision to end program 287(g), which allowed local law enforcement to enforce federal immigration law without the feds. Immigration and Customs Enforcement are now ordered to be selective in responding to calls from the border and may only respond if the illegal immigration has committed a felony.

A version of this column originally appeared in

Related Posts:

Tags:  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Readers Comments (25)

  1. Why? so the cartels can come across?

  2. So his voters can come across !!!!

  3. Ed Southwell says:

    Politics pure politics…. This is how a spoiled little king responds to being told NO.

  4. Hank Bentley says:

    So more votes can come across !!

  5. Someone should close his office!

  6. Obama and Janet N. don’t know what border security means. Closing patrol stations is sheer stupidity.

  7. Hey, they don’t neef them now. Oblamer is giving all of them a free pass.

  8. He wants to give amnesty eventually, so what’s the difference to him, he doesn’t seem to think its a problem. It’s gonna get so much worse, those coming across really have nothing to lose, so why not take a chance. Worse thing is they get caught and get sent back to try another day!! It’s a joke!

  9. They need volunteers to man the posts. I would give them 6 months out of the year to help patrol and keep those parasites out.

  10. Allen Tobin says:

    I smell somthing rotten here.

  11. Maybe American patriots need to step in and guard those stations in order to defend our nation and keep those who would have unfavorable ideas out.

  12. Les Ann says:

    Perhaps he’s not closing border stations to keep them out, but to keep us in!!!

  13. wants more muslim terrorists to help him with his dictatorship plans … those “pesky” republicians keep getting in the way —

  14. Cody Cotton says:

    I was watching c-span congressional hearings the other day and the government is counting on immigrants to populate this country because hard working Americans are not having enough kids to support social security while they are busy supporting the illegal immigrants. Oxymoron

  15. Face book must like Obama as I have no ability to nshare this story!

  16. yep, that is what he wants. to keep Americans from having jobs and allowing evey nationality to come in free healthcare, free food, free utilities, free loaders.

  17. Merry Steen says:

    WHY?? Let’s get caught with our pants down again for a repeat of 9/11- oh that’s right we have a muzzie contriolling and destroying our country from the inside!

  18. Sue Moore says:

    Also, there will be more votes for O what,s his name !!!!!

  19. Wonder why the KING didn’t include my state and N.M. Perhaps he knows that WE would occupy those closed stations??????

  20. McGuire Eddy says:


  21. He’s a bigger NUT case that I thought!

  22. More of the same bad decisions he makes. Does he not care about the results of them? No sense at all.

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

What is 15 + 11 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)


There may be graphic photographs that accompany some articles in the body of this report. It is not our intention to sensationalize. We include these photos in order to give to you, the American public, a clearer understanding of the seriousness of the situation we are in.


Why do you think the drug cartels are more violent in Mexico than the U.S.A.

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...


Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The US Open Borders, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The US Open Borders. The US Open Borders is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The US Open Borders is not supported by any political organization. The US Open Borders is a non-profit, non-partisan research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The US Open Borders is copyrighted. US Open Borders goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.