Filed Under:  Arizona

SB 1070 ruling not stirring same exodus fear for immigrants

June 27th 2012   ·   7 Comments

Thousands of undocumented immigrants picked up stakes and left Arizona after Gov. Jan Brewer signed Senate Bill 1070 two years ago, but with the most sweeping part of the

law about to be enforced, another mass exodus is not shaping up. At least for now.

Instead, many undocumented immigrants are preparing to wait to see how the law will be enforced after the Supreme Court on Monday struck down three provisions of the law but let stand the part that requires local police to check the status of people they suspect are in the country illegally.

“I’m going to take a risk and see what happens,” said Israel Fernandez, 37, an undocumented immigrant from Mexico City who has lived in the United States for eight years, the past five in Phoenix.

His comments, echoed by many other undocumented immigrants interviewed over the past two days, show a dramatic change from two years ago, when immigrants without papers began packing up, some within hours, after Brewer signed SB 1070.

That is partly because Department of Homeland Security officials said Monday that they were directing immigration-enforcement officials in Arizona not to deport illegal immigrants identified through enforcement of SB 1070 unless they meet the agency’s priorities. Since 2011, the agency has focused on deporting illegal immigrants who are dangerous criminals, recent border crossers and repeat immigration violators.

“I think my chances of being arrested might increase,” Fernandez said. “But I don’t have a criminal record so I don’t think I will be deported.”

State Rep. John Kavanagh, R-Fountain Hills, one of the main sponsors of SB 1070, said one of the goals of the law was to spur illegal immigrants to leave the state on their own out of fear they could be questioned by the police and deported following even routine traffic stops.

“Unfortunately,” Kavanagh said, he doesn’t think that will happen now.

“Had the Obama administration continued enforcement of immigration laws, then I think you would have seen a major exodus of illegals who were here out of the state and far fewer would come to Arizona,” he said.

Instead, Kavanagh said, President Barack Obama has sent “a clear message that, for the time being, anyway, Arizona is a safe place to be.”

Beginning of the exodus

In the weeks after Brewer signed SB 1070 on April 23, 2010, immigrant neighborhoods were flooded with yard sales as immigrants sold belongings to lighten their loads for the return trip to Mexico or to raise money to start over again in other states.

A March report by the Department of Homeland Security estimated that the state’s undocumented population, which is mostly concentrated in the Phoenix area, may have shrunk by as much as 200,000 from the peak in 2008 to January 2011.

The exodus further dented the economy during the height of the state’s housing crisis and turned thriving immigrant neighborhoods into areas filled with vacant houses, apartments and storefronts.

Senate Bill 1070 was the broadest and toughest of a string of laws passed by voters and lawmakers in recent years aimed at driving illegal immigrants out of the state through a strategy known as attrition through enforcement.

The collapse of the state’s construction industry, and the implementation of mandatory electronic employee-verification checks under the state’s employer-sanctions law in 2008 had driven large numbers of illegal immigrants out because they no longer could get jobs.

But the exodus accelerated after Brewer signed SB 1070, as fear spread that the chances of being deported would rise as police began questioning people about their immigration status as a matter of course.

In July 2010, however, a federal judge put most of the law on hold, including the most-feared “papers, please” portion that required police to check the status of people they suspected of being in the country illegally.

On Monday, the Supreme Court rejected as unconstitutional parts of the law that would have made it a state misdemeanor crime for illegal immigrants to work in Arizona or fail to carry federally-issued immigration papers, and would have allowed police to arrest immigrants without warrants if they suspected they had committed a crime that rendered them deportable from the United States.

But the court upheld the “papers, please” provision. It is unclear when a lower court will lift an injunction, allowing it to be enforced.

Immigrants dealing with aftermath

Inside an office building on Seventh Street in Phoenix on Tuesday, volunteers began taking calls on a hotline set up to answer questions about the Supreme Court’s ruling.

“I don’t see a lot of calls from people saying, ‘We are thinking of getting up and going,’ ” said Lydia Guzman, an immigrant advocate who oversees the hotline. “I am not seeing that now, but who knows.”

Volunteers staffing the phones said the majority of calls were from undocumented immigrants seeking information about giving power of attorney to family members or friends to care for their children in case they are deported, indicating they are planning to stay.

“To me, that is a sign that people want to live here in the situation we are in,” said Doris Marie Provine, an Arizona State University justice-studies professor who spent the afternoon as a volunteer answering calls to the hotline at an office building in Phoenix.

“I haven’t had anybody (call and) say, ‘We need to leave because of SB 1070′ or ‘I’ve gotten more scared because of SB 1070,’ ” Provine said.

Related Posts:

Tags:  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

By

Readers Comments (7)

  1. Bob Petschke says:

    Time for the vigilanties…

  2. Imagine that? Monarch Obama got what he wanted, more Mexicans to vote for him in November. This national traitor must be done in one folks or we are all toast!

  3. Ann Prothro says:

    What good is law until those who can force its being ignored are compelled to become law-abiding. A law-ignoring attorney general is more kinds of moron than just oxymoron.

  4. David Hoover says:

    They are NOT “undocumented immigrants”, they are ILLEGAL ALIENS…

  5. Go ask Joe & see what happens Israel Ferna! Please!

  6. To bad, we should be shooting them like most other countries do… End of problem….





Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

What is 14 + 4 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

BEWARE

There may be graphic photographs that accompany some articles in the body of this report. It is not our intention to sensationalize. We include these photos in order to give to you, the American public, a clearer understanding of the seriousness of the situation we are in.

Polls

Why do you think the drug cartels are more violent in Mexico than the U.S.A.

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Loading

Facebook



Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The US Open Borders usopenborders.com, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The US Open Borders. The US Open Borders is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The US Open Borders is not supported by any political organization. The US Open Borders is a non-profit, non-partisan research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The US Open Borders is copyrighted. US Open Borders goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.