Filed Under:  Border Patrol, Border Security, Illegal Aliens

Lessons for U.S. Southern Border from Interview with Canadian Mountie

June 14th 2012   ·   0 Comments

Barely anyone in the United States bothers to talk about the northern border with Canada because it is basically tranquil. While I blogged about 330 illegal aliens over a 12 mile stretch of Arizona in one night a few weeks ago, Canada’s twice-as-long border with the U.S. gets about 1,700 apprehensions a whole year. So we needn’t pay attention to the northern border, right?

Wrong. While it may never be possible to 100 percent secure any border, listening to how criminal movement across our borders can successfully be interdicted is essential to anyone who really wants to understand what “border security” can mean.

The extensive cooperation between the U.S. and Canada should be providing us lessons for the southern border. Not all is transferable, considering the opposite state of affairs in the two countries – Mexico continues to experience out-of-control violence, while Canada pursues with vigor what may seem relatively minor offenses to us – firearms sales by a single supplier, for instance, or contraband tobacco. However, the level of sharing of border intelligence and joint management of investigations and prosecutions of border-related crime, and potentially national security cases related to terrorism, make Canada’s Integrated Border Enforcement Teams (IBETs) worth a closer look. We do not approach our southern border as an integrated whole for intelligence or investigative purposes, nor for apprehensions, and the U.S.-Canada coordination on the northern border is worthy of consideration at policy and operational levels on the southern border, even if only among different U.S. agencies.

Recently, improvements have been made in the cooperation between the U.S. and Canada, and in one of my most articulate and interesting interviews to date on “The Homeland Security Show with Janice Kephart” (something I do on my own and that is not a Center for Immigration Studies project), Superintendent Warren Coons of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), director of 24 IBETs that span the entire U.S.-Canadian border, describes his bird’s-eye view of the border and the current and future cooperation between the two nations. (Click here for the audio file of the interview.) One anecdote Supt. Coons provided during the radio interview involved investigation and tracking by American law enforcement of a firearms supplier who was buying guns in the U.S., tracked across the border to point of delivery in Canada by the RCMP, and then tracked further into the Canadian interior by RCMP colleagues to the transfer of those guns to gangs. Contrast this with the shocking ineptitude of the “Fast and Furious” gun-running operation (which I discussed with Fox News reporter William Lajeunesse in Show 1 of “The Homeland Security Show“).

One needed improvement regarding the IBETs on the northern border: U.S. and Canadian counterparts do not currently have interoperable communications, which creates problems related to safety and operational coordination, especially in remote, difficult terrain and weather. IBETs are looking to fix that, and fully cross-designate officers to be able to work in teams on either side of the border within the next couple of years. Also helpful is the announcement by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano confirming that the U.S. government is using unmanned drones to patrol the U.S.-Canadian border from North Dakota 950 miles west to Washington State, providing aerial surveillance support for border agents by investigating sensor activity in remote areas to distinguish between real threats or rescue situation and false alarms. If the intelligence from the drone becomes fully integrated with the IBET intelligence teams described by Supt. Coons in our interview, the drone will be a worthy addition to surveillance in remote areas open to smuggling of persons and contraband, and exploited by terrorists, despite the concerns about drones by the Office of Inspector General, as reported by my colleague David North.

Related Posts:

Tags:  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Readers Comments (0)

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

What is 15 + 15 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)


There may be graphic photographs that accompany some articles in the body of this report. It is not our intention to sensationalize. We include these photos in order to give to you, the American public, a clearer understanding of the seriousness of the situation we are in.


Why do you think the drug cartels are more violent in Mexico than the U.S.A.

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...


Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The US Open Borders, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The US Open Borders. The US Open Borders is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The US Open Borders is not supported by any political organization. The US Open Borders is a non-profit, non-partisan research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The US Open Borders is copyrighted. US Open Borders goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.