Filed Under:  Border Security, Houston

Border security divides Democratic senate candidates

June 27th 2012   ·   1 Comment

Two underfunded U.S. Senate candidates battling for the Democratic Party‘s nomination squared off Tuesday in hopes of escaping the shadows of their GOP opponents and capturing a statewide victory for the first time since 1994.

Former state Rep. Paul Sad­ler and retired educator Grady Yarbrough, who said they have spent a combined $165,000 campaigning, agreed on many of the issues including same-sex marriage, Social Security benefits and foreign policy. They split on border security and decriminalizing marijuana.

Sadler, a lawyer who served six terms in the Texas House, questioned his opponent’s qualifications for a congressional seat.

“At the level of the United States Senate, experience is important,” Sadler said. “I don’t think you can make the important choices until you have been (in a legislative body) and had to make those decisions and live with the consequences.”

Sadler, who served as the chair of the House Public Education Committee from 1995-2003, said the only other candidates, beside himself, who filed for the election and are qualified for the Senate are his Republican opponents.

Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst is battling former Solicitor General Ted Cruz in a runoff for the GOP nomination.

Yarbrough, running in his fourth statewide election and second as a Democrat, disagreed and said he would endorse Sadler if defeated in the July 31 runoff.

At one point in the debate the candidates were given the opportunity to ask the other a question.

Yarbrough, 75, questioned Sadler’s plan to create jobs if elected.

Sadler said he did not have a question to ask his opponent.

“(Yarbrough) can ask me two,” he said and later added, “I really don’t have anything to ask him.”

Immigration took a front seat in much of the conversation, including border violence, drug laws and the Supreme Court ruling on Arizona’s immigration law.

continue reading

Related Posts:

Tags:  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

By

Readers Comments (1)

  1. Why if you all would have done something about it in the first place there would be no debate today. Stupid Jackass’s…..





Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

What is 5 + 7 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

BEWARE

There may be graphic photographs that accompany some articles in the body of this report. It is not our intention to sensationalize. We include these photos in order to give to you, the American public, a clearer understanding of the seriousness of the situation we are in.

Polls

Why do you think the drug cartels are more violent in Mexico than the U.S.A.

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Loading

Facebook



Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The US Open Borders usopenborders.com, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The US Open Borders. The US Open Borders is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The US Open Borders is not supported by any political organization. The US Open Borders is a non-profit, non-partisan research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The US Open Borders is copyrighted. US Open Borders goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.