Filed Under:  Border Patrol

Bill would increase Border Patrol access to sensitive federal lands, national parks

June 23rd 2012   ·   0 Comments

The Rio Grande in Big Bend National Park marks the border between the US and Mexico. Border Patrol agents will have more access to national park land in a bill that passed the House this week. (Photo courtesy of NPS/Eric Leonard)

Measure crucial to controlling border crime, DHS says

Charles Scudder

Scripps Howard Foundation Wire

WASHINGTON – The sweeping vistas of Big Bend National Park may be breathtaking, but the park’s proximity to the U.S.-Mexico border makes the deep canyons of the Rio Grande kindling for political feuds.

For much of the 20.7 million acres of federally owned land on the border, access for both visitors and officials – including Border Patrol agents – is limited to foot and horseback traffic to preserve the environment.

The relationship between the National Park Service and the Border Patrol could change with a bill the House of Representatives passed this week.

H.R. 2578, an omnibus bill that includes multiple provisions for conservation, includes a provision that would waive 16 laws to allow the Border Patrol nearly unlimited access federal lands within 100 miles of the border. This would allow trucks to drive where motor vehicles are normally unauthorized, construction for infrastructure in otherwise untouched areas and drones to patrol where overflights are otherwise prohibited.

That includes the entirety of Big Bend National Park, along with 53 other national park properties and 228 national wildlife refuges in the four states on the Mexican border and along the U.S.-Canadian border.

Kim Thorsen, a deputy assistant secretary at the Department of the Interior, testified before a House subcommittee that the bill could harm the natural and cultural resources in federal care.

Thorsen oversees law enforcement, security and emergency management and said that the DOI works closely with the Department of Homeland Security – which oversees the U.S Customs and Border Patrol – to keep the U.S. border safe.

“The administration opposes H.R. 1505,” she said, using a former number for the bill. “We believe a better model for the protection of the border is the current approach of collaborating among departments and using the best expertise in each to solve problems.”

Officials with the DHS also testified that cooperation with various agencies was crucial to success in controlling crime on the border.

Border Patrol Deputy Chief Ronald Vitiello testified alongside Thorsen.

“We respect the missions of these agencies and we recognize the importance of the preservation of the American landscape,” Vitiello said. “Border security and environmental stewardship are not mutually exclusive. Through common sense and collaborative efforts, we can achieve these dual missions.”

Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, chairman of the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands of the House Natural Resources Committee, introduced the bill.

“We have had several members of our Border Patrol who have been murdered in this exact same area,” Bishop said during the House debate on the bill. “More and more individuals, both Americans and of Mexican extraction, are being assaulted, murdered, raped and robbed in this particular area, and it is all happening on federal land.”

He brought a map to the House floor and pointed out that most border-related crimes occur on federally owned land with access restrictions rather than on privately owned land.

In some wilderness areas, for example, motorized vehicle use is prohibited to protect endangered species, such as the Sonoran pronghorn antelope, and delicate environments. Patrols currently must work on foot in these areas.

“Border Patrol should not be stopped or inhibited in anything they do. The environment is being trashed by illegal entry,” Bishop said in a subcommittee hearing in April 2011 on the issue. “It is not national security that is threatening our environment; it is the lack of national security that is threatening our environment.”

Some national park supporters say that increasing border security in such a way would harm the environments set aside for federal protection.

At the National Parks Conservation Association, a private non-profit that serves as a watchdog for the parks, opposition to the omnibus bill is abundant.

“It’s just unfathomable how far this goes,” Craig Obey, NPCA vice president for governmental affairs, said. “It just says, ‘Do whatever the heck you want and damn with the rest.’”

Obey and Thorsen said that coordination between Border Patrol and park officials can be mutually beneficial. In her testimony, Thorsen said law enforcement personnel from the Department of the Interior frequently accompany Border Patrol agents on patrols.

“The Park Service often knows the terrain better, frankly, and can help them,” Obey said. “What you want to have is a system where people work together.”

Rep. Raúl Grijalva, D-Ariz., the senior Democrat on the subcommittee, opposed the bill and, with the majority of House Democrats, voted against it.

The bill passed 303-112.

“This is theater of the absurd,” Grijalva said at a press conference Tuesday. “The solution to the stress we have on that border is not to suspend laws that protect us.”

The bill now goes to the Senate.

While some Border Patrol activities may have an impact on the landscape, both DOI and DHS officials said that leaving the border unprotected could cause more damage to the environment.

“We recognize that, despite our efforts to institute a wide variety of best practices, our border security mission can have an impact to the environment,” Vitiello said. “We also know, however, that we can patrol the border in an educated and environmentally conscious manner and we remain to doing so.”

A version of this column originally appeared in www.riograndedigital.com.

Related Posts:

Tags:  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

By

Readers Comments (0)





Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

What is 13 + 4 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

BEWARE

There may be graphic photographs that accompany some articles in the body of this report. It is not our intention to sensationalize. We include these photos in order to give to you, the American public, a clearer understanding of the seriousness of the situation we are in.

Polls

Why do you think the drug cartels are more violent in Mexico than the U.S.A.

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Loading

Facebook



Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The US Open Borders usopenborders.com, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The US Open Borders. The US Open Borders is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The US Open Borders is not supported by any political organization. The US Open Borders is a non-profit, non-partisan research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The US Open Borders is copyrighted. US Open Borders goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.