Filed Under:  Crime, ICE, Immigration

7.5 percent of deportations may get held

April 26th 2012   ·   6 Comments

SANTA ANA, Calif. — Immigration officials have offered to shelve 7.5 percent of deportation cases under a massive review of the backlogged U.S. system aimed at focusing on deporting more criminals, authorities said Tuesday.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement has offered to temporarily suspend the deportation cases of roughly 16,500 people after reviewing more than 70 percent of the immigration cases pending as of mid-April, according to statistics released by the agency.

ICE officials said 2,700 cases have been shelved. The rest still require paperwork and background checks.

It was not immediately clear how many immigrants had been told of the offer or how many had accepted it.

The Obama administration announced in August that roughly 300,000 deportation cases would be reviewed and non-criminals and those illegal immigrants who posed no public safety or national security threat would likely have their cases put on hold indefinitely.

The move was welcomed by immigrant advocates but reviled by critics who called the program an attempt by the administration to work around Congress.

Since then, however, immigrant advocates have complained the government is offering to apply so-called prosecutorial discretion in too few instances, and that those whose deportation cases are put on the back burner still don’t get a work permit.

So far, the approval rate “is a very low number,” said Gregory Chen, director of advocacy for the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

“You can’t expect people to not be able to feed their families and have some source of income and still survive,” he added.

Some say immigrants might do better by trying their luck in immigration court, where, for example, they could seek asylum.

More than half of immigrants whose asylum cases were decided by an immigration judge in the 2011 fiscal year actually won their cases, according to statistics from the Executive Office for Immigration Review, which runs the country’s immigration court system.

ICE deputy press secretary Gillian Christensen said the review is ongoing. The main focus is to enable authorities to focus on deporting illegal immigrants with criminal records or those who previously ignored court orders to leave the country.

“This review is designed to allow the agency to make the best use of its limited resources,” she said in a statement.

Of the cases put on hold to date, the vast majority — more than 2,000 — involve immigrants who have lived in the country for a long time and have an immediate relative who is an American citizen. About 175 are children and 180 are college students or graduates who came to the U.S. when they were under 16 and have lived in the country for more than five years, the agency said.

In addition, immigration officials said they are also putting a halt on some deportation orders.

Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington, said some initially thought the program would bring sweeping change to the deportation process but the latest data shows it hasn’t turned out that way.

“I’m glad they pulled their punch,” said Krikorian, whose organization favors stricter immigration limits, “though obviously I would have preferred they not do this thing altogether.”

Copyright 2012 Associated Press

Related Posts:

Tags:  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Readers Comments (6)

  1. Janice Laine says:

    It should be 75 percent. Federal U.S. CODE Title 18.

  2. Janice Laine says:

    It should be 75 percent. Federal U.S. CODE Title 18.


  4. Joy Wright says:

    All illegals are criminals so what is the reasoning here?

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

What is 15 + 3 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)


There may be graphic photographs that accompany some articles in the body of this report. It is not our intention to sensationalize. We include these photos in order to give to you, the American public, a clearer understanding of the seriousness of the situation we are in.


Why do you think the drug cartels are more violent in Mexico than the U.S.A.

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...


Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The US Open Borders, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The US Open Borders. The US Open Borders is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The US Open Borders is not supported by any political organization. The US Open Borders is a non-profit, non-partisan research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The US Open Borders is copyrighted. US Open Borders goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.